Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Effect of surface anodization on stability of orthodontic microimplant

Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2012³â 42±Ç 1È£ p.4 ~ 10
Karmarker Sanket, À¯¿øÀç, °æÈñ¹®,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Karmarker Sanket ) - Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics
À¯¿øÀç ( Yu Won-Jae ) - Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics
°æÈñ¹® ( Kyung Hee-Moon ) - Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics

Abstract


Objective: To determine the effect of surface anodization on the interfacial strength between an orthodontic microimplant (MI) and the rabbit tibial bone, particularly in the initial phase aft er placement.

Methods: A total of 36 MIs were driven into the tibias of 3 mature rabbits by using the self-drilling method and then removed aft er 6 weeks. Half the MIs were as-machined (n = 18; machined group), while the remaining had anodized surfaces (n = 18; anodized group). Th e peak insertion torque (PIT) and the peak removal torque (PRT) values were measured for the 2 groups of MIs. Th ese values were then used to calculate the interfacial shear strength between the MI and cortical bone.

Results: Th ere were no statistical differences in terms of PIT between the 2 groups. However, mean PRT was signifi cantly greater for the anodized implants (3.79 ¡¾ 1.39 Ncm) than for the machined ones (2.05 ¡¾ 1.07 Ncm) (p < 0.01). The interfacial strengths, converted from PRT, were calculated at 10.6 MPa and 5.74 MPa for the anodized and machined group implants, respectively.

Conclusions: Anodization of orthodontic MIs may enhance their early-phase retention capability, thereby ensuring a more reliable source of absolute anchorage.

Å°¿öµå

Orthodontic microimplant;Anodization;Self drilling;Interfacial shear strength

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed